![]() |
|
||||||||
| Home > Designing, engineering and implementing Single Platform Maximo ® for the U.S. Navy | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
The power of the Internet was there. Figuring out how to leverage it was the challenge. Like many large organizations, the Navy’s Public Works Centers (PWCs) were dogged by disparate systems, islands of data and redundant input. A system capable of supporting concurrent use among multiple sites and time zones, and a myriad of project requirements and reporting standards was needed. No small order. New ground would have to be broken. The mission included maintenance planning, work order execution and integration with the Navy’s financial system. It also called for a thorough assessment of assets to determine deficiencies, redundancies and equipment condition. This was necessary to determine the extent to which consolidation was needed, while assessing the support required for the units covering the Navy’s war fighting capabilities. In the end, there had to be one process, one consistent look, and one single set of rules for maintaining and supporting the Navy’s facilities and assets. Enterprise Asset Management standardization Initially, the goal was to engineer nine (later reduced to eight) site-specific, similarly configured PWC systems, where each PWC ran an independent instance of Maximo that communicated with a local database in a client server architecture. The Navy specialists, with the help of TRM project managers and technical services staff, standardized all the PWCs to one system, creating the ability to assess business processes and organize and s t r u c t u r e Maximo in a similar manner for each location. This move to Maximo resulted in the reduction of nearly 300 separate systems to eight Maximo operations. It was when TRM assisted the Navy in the development of “PWC Corporate Core Standards” to define the business processes, tools and configuration management policies required to implement and maintain the core standard that it became obvious that another level of consolidation was necessary. Ultimately this resulted in Single Platform Maximo (SPM). Like most businesses during this time, the Navy leaders were being challenged to improve operational efficiencies and reduce costs. The Internet was proving to be a way to offer flexibility and scalability. In the fall of 2002, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command ( NAVFAC) team was directed to accelerate the move to web technology. The PWC Maximo community was challenged to go beyond “separate but equal” standardization to develop a single configuration that operated at a single host site with the ability to view facility maintenance management data across the entire Navy. The evolution of SPM The technical and organizational challenges of SPM are great. The team quickly realized that the tradeoffs of being able to view asset information across the entire organization, from any browser, involved complex configuration considerations – including business rules, screens and interfaces to other applications. Because of the complex nature of the project and the vast number of concurrent activities, the SPM-integrated product team recommended a structured project management approach. Phases included planning, requirements, design and installation/acceptance. “TRM was able to quickly shift focus to meet the dynamic nature of the Navy’s PWC world. In-depth analysis and problem-solving occurred at every step, especially as we dealt with emerging requirements,” said Ken Kelley, NAVFAC Assistant CIO for PWCs. Two pilot sites were designated, PWC Washington and PWC Norfolk. The functionality and application of SPM was to be completely defined by the time the first two pilot sites were in full production. After both pilot sites go live and Initial Operating Capability (IOC) is achieved, the rest of the PWCs will phase into SPM, two sites at a time. Due to its close proximity to NAVFAC headquarters and its organizational and functional complexity, Washington was the first site to go live. “My hat’s off to the TRM Team,” said John Hopkins, PWC Washington Maximo project manager, when the Washington PWC went live in August 2003. “I was impressed with TRM’s problem resolution process during the go-live week, and how well activities and processes were organized.” Norfolk, the Navy’s largest PWC, is expected to go live with SPM in July 2004. Additional load testing and continual application monitoring will precede each additional PWC as it is converted to the new SPM platform. “Single Platform Maximo is historic,” says Don Omura, vice president of Pacific operations for TRM. “It leverages web technology to simultaneously standardize business practices, consolidate facilities data and reduce IT development and operating expenses. And, while this has been a major technical challenge, the job of managing changes to organizational and business processes has been equally important. We’re not just moving Maximo to the web; we’re moving people and organizations to an enterprise-level set of standardized business processes. This calls for major adjustments on all fronts.” The difference is real at PWC Washington. Users doubleclick their Internet browser and access a new, industrial strength web application hosted at a central location 2,700 miles away, in Port Hueneme, CA at the NAVFAC Information Technology Center (NITC). Functionality and integration, including customer (work order) management, handheld devices, financials, facilities condition assessment and readiness, purchasing and reporting, are being migrated to one application, one data base, one set of standardized business processes. The bottom line – one view of the facilities management data across the entire corporation. Virtual teaming The virtual teams have worked to finalize the functional and data requirements and design a system architecture that supports the Maximo web technology, complies with Navy IT security rules, supports 4,000 users and provides enough redundancy to ensure continuity of operations 24/7. This virtual teaming method uses collaborative tools for communication and configuration management to maintain the integrity of the development code. TRM has developed a center of excellence around application benchmarking and monitoring as part of its standard system engineering procedure. TRM’s virtual team provides system diagnosis and problem solving in real time using sophisticated load testing, application performance tuning and monitoring tools. “There’s definitely an ebb and flow to a project of this magnitude,” says Omura. “We apply resources when we need them. The number of TRM people working in the development stage is fewer, but there is a huge surge of work checking, testing and meeting before we go live. At times, we’ve had as many as 40 people working on our highly specialized team.” Systems engineering TRM’s ability to successfully work with the Naval Information Technology Center, or NITC, the application hosting site, plus representatives from each PWC and other SPM team contractors is a critical component of success. This collective organization brings deep experience and history in providing enterprise computing support for Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Other activities in areas such as load testing and wide-area network analysis have provided insight on performance requirements, connectivity, security maintenance, capacity planning and end-user desktop viewpoints. TRM system engineers are focusing a keen eye on methodologies directed toward risk mitigation before, during and after system rollout. World-class tools are being used to ensure continued success throughout the system lifecycle. This global enterprise asset management system is being deployed during the Navy’s transition from a legacy environment to the Navy Marine Corp Intranet (NMCI) – the environment that provides network-based information services to sailors and marines during day-to-day activities. Training Tools that improve productivity, flexibility and reporting TRM RulesManager allows the team to implement complex rules within Maximo without complex technology. TRM RulesManager plays into the rapid development and turnaround of prototypes as well. This tool allows the user to continue operating at optimum capacity while SPM provides flexibility to accommodate site-specific requirements and needs. Customer requirements vary, as do the regulatory environments from state to state. TRM RulesManager provides a method for bringing localized rules into a fully standardized system. The addition of TRM RulesManager provided the Navy with the ability to implement its business rules without extensive internal Java programming in Maximo. This reduced costs associated with development and future upgrade or migration as Maximo 5 matures. TRM ScreenBuilder allows rapid development of Maximo screen designs. TRM and the Navy users were able to prototype an application to check whether or not it met end-user requirements. TRM ScreenBuilder is an easy, drag and drop, graphical screen editor that provides a means to prototype quickly, make modifications and turn around prototype findings. The Maximo screens now are easily adapted to fit the Navy’s work processes. TRM KPI Manager resulted from TRM’s analysis of how the Navy at the Norfolk and Washington PWCs reported their maintenance activities. Initially, only seven reports were thought useful. A closer analysis helped TRM determine that 25 elements were critical measures for effectively viewing the maintenance processes. TRM created KPI Manager to graphically display and manage the maintenance and financial data as required from the report. More than 50 measures are now in place. Customizing a successful solution “The SPM experience with the Navy allowed us to further refine our approach to enterprise asset management challenges,” said Ray Brisbane, TRM president and chief executive officer. “We respond to key stakeholder missions and specific business problems that affect assets, facility management information delivery and demands at every level of the organization.” As the Navy continues to consolidate each of the PWCs systems onto Single Platform Maximo the methodologies developed in the pilot phase with TRM will be applied to each new site. The system itself continues to evolve. The network is getting stronger and more efficient. And the Navy is getting closer to winning the operational improvement battle it set out to win over two years ago. The Navy’s PWCs soon will speak with one very strong, clear engineering voice, using a single, efficient and cost-effective system.
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||